> Okay, I'm telling you now...this posting is OUT OF CHARACTER for me.
> Here is a JUST FOR FUN posting (well, mostly "just for fun").
>
>
> Single-Op, Assisted
But we don't knew by who or how much??? We must be more specific!
> Single-Op, Unlimited
But you are limited to a single op?? sounds like an oxymoron to me... or is
that what the operator is?
>
> Single-Op, Enhanced?
Does this only apply to 'natural male enhancement'??? what about female
ops???
> Single-Op, Connected?
Well connected??
>
> Not-Single-Op?
Now we are getting somewhere, its easy to not prove a negative. Or is that,
its hard to prove a double negative? Oh to heck with it, this is just too
negative.
> Über-Single-Op?
This is better, but you will have to get all the software authors to do
umlauts and add that to the acceptable character set for Cabrillo first.
>
> Symbiotic-Op?
Parasitic-op??
> Colony-Op?
I have heard Nudist colony ops.
> Cluster-Op?
Cluster what???
> Network-Op?
I networked with people to find a new job, does that count?
>
> Resourced-Op?
Outsourced op?
> Shared-data-Op?
Private data? Public data? Shared memory?
> Live-stream-Op?
I know a web site with lots of live streaming ops, but they want too much
per minute to chat with them.
>
> Single-Op Distracted (this one was coined by K3WW, in case any of you were
> not sure).
This has been around too long, but may be the best term over all.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|