CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers vs. power

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers vs. power
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 22:23:33 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In the past the arrl log checkers have explained that they have ways to
detect 'unstable' exchanges and discount them from the log checking process
so the recipients don't get penalized.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry
> Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 19:24
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Serial numbers vs. power
> 
> During the contest, especially at the beginning, some guys were sending
> serial number (or zone.)  By the end of the contest, they corrected
> their ways.
> 
> For example, I worked a guy at 0200Z Sat who gave me 599067.  When I
> worked him on another band Sunday evening, it was 599500.
> 
> Sooo, do I correct the first QSO, hoping the log-checking software
> doesn't ding me for it (it does check exchanges, doesn't it?)
> 
> 73,
> Barry
> 
> --
> 
> Barry Kutner, W2UP
> Newtown, PA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>