CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?

To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>,"David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?
From: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 04:35:39 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The person in question has an extra class license...de Rick
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Gilbert" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
To: "Rick Dougherty" <nq4i@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] logic here?


>
> Hi, Rick.
>
> Two possibilities quickly come to mind, but I'm sure there are others.
>
> a.  N2XYZ is an Extra Class licensee but doesn't realize that the rules
> now allow him to transmit on 3670.
>
> b.  N2XYZ is a General Class licensee and isn't allowed to transmit
> below 3800, but figures he can snag a quieter listening frequency down
> the band..
>
> 73,
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
>
> Rick Dougherty wrote:
> > Hi all...just listening around on 75 m ssb  during the ARRL SSB test and
observed the following....US station N2XYZ cqing on a 3820 +- freq and qsx
on 3670+- freq...why do this? Why not cq on 3670 and listen on that same
freq? We now have the privileges for the freq and they are definitely quiet
enough?? Or am I entirely missing something here? de Rick nq4i
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> >
>
> --
> Subvert the dominant paradigm.
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>