To: | <kr2q@optonline.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track |
From: | "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net> |
Reply-to: | Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net> |
Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:29:11 -0700 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
So helpful that KR2Q has defined the "track" for us. Thank you, Sir: Doug wrote: (snip) > Does inability to catch everybody all the time mean that we should abandon > rational > rules and logical entry categories...NO WAY! The CQ WW DX Committee, of which KR2Q is a Member, continues to promote and foster "rules" that are so archaic, arbitrary, and applied so capriciously, I shudder to see the words "rules" and "rational" used in the same sentence....... Vy 73 Jim Neiger N6TJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track, kr2q |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2007 NA Sprint RTTY - 3830 Claimed Scores 12Mar2007, mwdink |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] spotting...let's get back on track, kr2q |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2007 NA Sprint RTTY - 3830 Claimed Scores 12Mar2007, mwdink |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |