You are ok with Wintest doing that as long as the cabrillo log file is
indicating which transmitter made each qso.
Consider this: Would it not be somewhat silly to send a serial number on a
band that the same serial has already been sent?
K6AW is busy operating at NR6O but I am sure he will make a post concerning
this at some point and also make some clarification on the printed rules.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Cassel <paul@ve3sy.com>
To: 'Rob Pack, NX5M' <nx5m@txcyber.com>; <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Cc: 'Paul VE3SY' <Paul@ve3sy.com>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:45 PM
Subject: RE: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict
What we are seeing here in M/2 with Wintest is at the start of the test say
Run 1 is on 80m with serial 1,2,3,4,5 and Run 2 is on 40 with serial 1,2,3,4
etc. Now later in the test Run 2 station operates 80 and his serial numbers
start up where the Run 1 stn left off. This would appear to not follow the
rule.
BUT - as you said, I'm sure the rules will be clarified and in a single
document before the CW test. I'm sure glad I will not be processing the
logs for this test :)
Paul VE3SY
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Pack, NX5M [mailto:nx5m@txcyber.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:34 AM
> To: Paul Cassel; CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict
>
> Serial numbers by band are ok in any of the multi classes.
> I say this because I asked.
> In multi-two, which is what we were going to do here until we ended up
> with
> an operator shortage, it was confirmed that numbers by band were fine.
> However, each log had to indicate which transmitter made which qso.
> In multi-single, consecutive serial numbers are fine as are numbers by
> band.
> All the log checkers really want is a log that indicates the actual qso
> number that was sent/received.
> Some software will not allow a set of serial numbers for the run station
> and
> a different set of numbers for the mult station when they are networked.
> Thus there became the option to keep numbers by band or consecutive
> numbers.
> Multi-multi can really not be done any other way.
>
> I think all of this will be clearly written in the near future so that
> everyone understands what their options are and how they can make it work
> for their particular logging software and networking.
> I believe that Steve, K6AW will confirm that what I am saying is true.
>
> 73,
> Bob NX5M
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Cassel <paul@ve3sy.com>
> To: <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
> Cc: 'Paul VE3SY' <Paul@ve3sy.com>
> Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:15 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] wpx rules conflict
>
>
> > I fully agree - M/2 can be interpreted as being a serial nbr for each of
> the
> > two radios however undr Exchange it states Multi Station Multi operator
> > stations the Serial Nbr is by band.
> >
> > The Wintest authors took this literally and assign a serial # per band
> even
> > in M/2
> >
> > Paul VE3SY
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Which of the 3 sets of rules I have found is the official one??
> > >
> > > http://www.cqwpx.com/rules.htm
> > > http://www.cqwpx.com/rules_2007.pdf
> > > http://www.cq-amateur-radio.com/WPX_Contest_Rules_2007.pdf
> > >
> > > I haven't compared the pdf's besides noting very different formatting.
> > But
> > > the html and pdf from cqwpx.com conflict in how to assign serial
> numbers
> > in
> > > the m/s class.
> >
> >
> > David Robbins K1TTT
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|