CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting - Final Reply

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting - Final Reply
From: Richard Thorne <rmthorne@suddenlink.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:53:23 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The last couple of days have been very interesting with all the opinions 
on this one.

Heres my stand on this.

1 - The FCC has rules in place that govern remote STATIONS, I'm 
following those rules.
2 - Contest rules and DXCC rules already address STATIONS.  I'm 
following those rules.
3 - Those of you against remote STATIONS (and there are only a few of 
you if you haven't figured it out yet) are hoping for new rules to limit 
or stop remote operations, good luck with that.

4 - The most important one.  I'm having a blast and I'm glad I can 
operate with a decent signal because I've put the time in to advance the 
hobby.

I'm off to test some remote software so I can be better prepared for my 
next needed DXCC entity or contest.

73,

Rich - N5ZC



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Remote Contesting - Final Reply, Richard Thorne <=