CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker

To: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:40:25 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] remember this? Russian Woodpecker


> Very unlikely, since the cw signal is not changing phase like a flying
> object it will be supressed in the radar receiver.
>
> 73
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Tope
>
> On the other hand, over the horizon backscatter from an ICBM has got to be
> pretty weak even when the radar's transmitted power is so bloody large, so
> it
> is not unreasonable to think that big yagi's with KW's pointed back at the
> receiver would be as least as loud as the backscatter from a relatively
> Small object like an ICBM.
>

Yes, you're probably right, Peter. The absolute signal level hitting
the receiver might be on par with the backscatter from a real target,
but the large bandwidth difference would allow for filtering out the
CW counter-jamming (my memory is fuzzy, but I seem to recall the
bandwidth of the UA Woodpecker being on order of 100 to 200 KHz
wide).

73, Mike W4EF.......................................... 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>