CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CK in ARRL SS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CK in ARRL SS
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 07:11:47 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
AA5JG said:

"Since you mention lawyers, you lead to another
potentially serious problem for the ARRL.  In the
legal world precedence is as important as anything,
and the ARRL has already set a bad precedence.  By
publically stating that they don't care if you follow
the check rule or not, in essence they have stated
that they don't care if their contest rules are
followed or not.  "

Wrong! This is what is known as a "hasty generalization" fallacy.

They have only made such a statement about the check. They did not say that
all rules should be ignored.

73,

Bob W5OV





_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>