CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Shall we argue how many Angels can dance on,the head of

To: Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Shall we argue how many Angels can dance on,the head of a pin?
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:30:36 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:52:13 -0500, Mike Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu> wrote:

>
>We have a philosophy of encouraging worthy modes of operation, which is 
>why we give CW contacts 1.5 and 2 points per contact (next year all CW 
>QSO's will be worth 2 points) But we're encouraging CW, not giving a 
>"head start" to CW Ops so to speak.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

I'm all in favor of encouraging more operators and different modes,
but I don't think multiplying scores is a good way to do it. Your
policy would indeed encourage CW, but it would also have the effect of
discouraging phone. Is that what you want?

IMO, it is better to have separate classes for CW, phone and mixed and
let people enter what ever class they want. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>