CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Vs. Multi Op.

To: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>,Untitled <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted Vs. Multi Op.
From: Mike Fatchett W0MU <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:51:58 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Then call is simply Single OP with Packet and not allow any other form of
help period.


On 12/20/07 9:41 PM, "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net> wrote:

> Another approach to "Assisted" vs. "Multi Op." argument.
> 
> You are Single Op Assisted, using spots from Dx Cluster.
> All of a sudden you need to go to bathroom (washroom). Who is going to
> replace you and make Contest QSOs? Guys who spot DX on DX Cluster?
> I don't think so.
> So, you have a big gap in your operation. You're still just a single guy
> with your radio in your shack...
> 
> Now, you are "real" Multi op. and you want to go to bathroom. Who is going
> to substitute you?
> Right, another operator from your real "Multi Op" crew.
> So, you don't have any gaps in your operation.
> 
> 73 Yuri  VE3DZ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>