CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] GET SCORES or GET SERIOUS

To: "CQ-Contest@contesting. com" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] GET SCORES or GET SERIOUS
From: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Jim Neiger <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:33 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Show of hands, please:  How many on this reflector got into contesting 
because of the real-time scoreboard we had at the 2002 WRTC in Finland?? 
Thank you. (I'll send you a bottle of scotch, if I can find it).

Some, here, seem to resent those who try and be the best of the best in a 
contest.

For those who do try and win, every possible (legal) advantage is put to 
maximum effort.  What's wrong with that?  And if a real-time scoreboard, 
however constructed or used,  gives one scintilla of advantage, would not 
that advantage be exploited?

You can hypothesize "what if's, woulda -coulda - shoulda" to the max, and 
create whatever answer for which you are searching.  Circular arguments with 
no meaningful utility.

We can also not count any scores, or have a competition, and just have a 
good old 48-hour ragchew.

One thing I learned many years ago, "The top never drags the bottom up.  The 
bottom always drags the top down".  I guess people don't feel so bad about 
themselves if everyone's grovelling around at the same  pathetic level.

As we wing our way towards mediocrity...........................

Vy 73

Jim Neiger   N6TJ 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>