To: | "John Geiger" <n5ten@yahoo.com>, "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@mindspring.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers... |
From: | "K-ZERO-HB" <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:44:47 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
It is useful to give the IODHW (International Order of Dismayed Hand Wringers) something to do with their hands. 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 > My point in this is that the rules state "the last 2 > digits of the year first licensed" but people have > stated publically on the reflector that they use other > checks, and the ARRL has stated that they don't care > what you send, and will not enforce this rule. If > that is true, then why include that line in the > contest rules? If they truely don't care, then just > say the check is "any 2 digit number you care to send" > in the rules? > _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests?, Paul O'Kane |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dumbing-Down Contests?, Robert Naumann |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Regarding Check Numbers..., John Geiger |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] GREAT Article on CW Skimmer in March 2008 RadCom (RSGB), Eric Rosenberg |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |