CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolution of the ARRL DX Exchange

To: 'Pete Smith' <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolution of the ARRL DX Exchange
From: Alan Leith <aleith@syd.eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:29:11 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 While it may lack punctuation, it showed up on my screen in three paragraphs 
and I found it relatively easy to read.  And I found it very informative.  I 
didn't get any of the computer characters that you did.


73

Al, VE1AL





-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Pete Smith
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 7:29 AM
To: W6UM@aol.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Evolution of the ARRL DX Exchange

What's up with the dramatic increase in the number of messages with no 
paragraph breaks and weird strings (“ooo”) in place of normal punctuation, 
and even apostrophes?  It makes messages dreadfully hard to read, and frankly 
leads me often to ignore what may be useful views or information.  An example 
is below.

73, Pete N4ZR


At 06:22 PM 2/22/2008, W6UM@aol.com wrote:
>   The changes in the ARRL DX Contest exchange over the  years have 
> been with the intent of making it more enjoyable and accessible for  
> all, especially for the DX stations.  Many years ago the exchange sent 
> by both W/VE and DX was  RST+ a 3-digit arbitrary number. The 
> arbitrary number was self-selected, not a  serial number, and thus 
> remained constant during the contest. The exchange was  then changed 
> for both W/VE and DX to RST+ a 3-digit number, where the number was  the 
> power input in watts.
> One big reason for the change was to enable getting a  valid contest 
> exchange from a not-in-the-contest DX station wandering onto the  band 
> during the contest. It was much easier just to ask for his power than 
> to  explain the business about an arbitrary number. One memorable 
> incident during this time occurred when an  unaware EA6, much needed 
> by all as a new multiplier, came on 15 meters and  created a pileup 
> answering his initial CQ. The first W he worked asked for his  power, 
> and the EA held down his key to read the meter and give an accurate  reply.
> Apparently his power supply couldn’t take the duty factor, and his 
> signal  wavered for a while and then quit entirely. W4KFC, among the 
> hopefuls waiting on  frequency, then went on and said “ I guess that 
> makes his power  000”. With the widespread use of electronic keyers 
> instead of  bugs, it was not possible to send long dashes for zeros, 
> so many stations began  using alphanumeric representations to indicate 
> their power. KH6IJ used to send  “ooo”, three dashes at a time. 
> RST values sent for a while were reasonably  representative. For many 
> years “ 579” was the standard, but the macho desire to  give and 
> receive bigger numbers has led to the point that “5NN” is now the  
> defacto preamble for what follows. Most signals now are not S9, and 
> many are not  T9 either. The contest exchange was finally changed to 
> its present  format, RST + state/province for W/VE and RST + power for 
> DX. This definitely  makes the contest more interesting and enjoyable 
> for the DX stations. For them  also, having some choice of an 
> alphanumeric representation of their power allows  some degree of 
> creativity. A unique power value serves as an identifier, which  helps 
> in the instances when the DX station sends his call rarely but sends his  
> power with each QSO.
> The way a station decides to indicate his power on cw can  be similar 
> to his choice of phonetics on ssb: whatever works best and requires  
> the fewest repeats. In ’08 and previously, DX stations with very 
> similar calls  purposefully chose different power indicators to help 
> minimize confusion. There  are many different ways to indicate 
> “1KW”. It appears the ARRL log robot will accept a wide variety of 
> alphanumeric combinations for power, even with  different numbers of 
> digits. Thus far, four digits seems to be  sufficient…. Bassed on DX 
> activity, the rules and the required exchange  do not seem to be 
> seriously limiting participation. Any changes considered  should only 
> to be to make it better for them, not for us. Chas.,  W6UM 
> **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living.
> (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-cam
> pos-duffy/
> 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)
> _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing 
> list CQ-Contest@contesting.com 
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>