| To: | "N1MM" <tfwagner@snet.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise |
| From: | "Glenn VA3DX" <va3dx@sympatico.ca> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:34:42 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Whose 50 most needed do we use ? Glenn va3dx Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise > Why not ask the ARRL to enforce the rule for the 50 most needed DXCC > entities and waive it for the rest? > > The contest sponsors could omit the logs from the same entities. Or they > could just remove the timestamps. > > Tom - N1MM _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule...the introduction (aka CONTEXT), k4zw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, VE5ZX |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, N1MM |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, VE5ZX |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |