[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: k-zero-hb@earthlink.net
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:36:59 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> If you consider CW to be something special, a mode that
> is intended to be decoded by ear (the one thing which
> sets it apart from all "other" data modes), then that's
> how you do it - all by yourself.
> Otherwise, you're a machine operator, not a CW operator.
> The use of code readers, including Skimmer, is
> incompatible with unassisted CW entries.
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI


You have captured the essence of the argument perfectly in those words. 
Thank you!

73, de Hans, K0HB
Just a boy and his radio
 ><{{{{*>    http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0h

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>