CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER
From: Roger Parsons <ve3zi@yahoo.com>
Reply-to: ve3zi@rac.ca
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 14:05:03 +0100 (BST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There is some very convoluted logic going on around
here. Reminds me of when my daughter asked for help on
her class on Classical Logic, fondly imagining that it
was remotely logical...

Skimmer certainly has the potential to be a disruptive
technology. That is the nature of innovation.

I have never been able to comprehend why SCP, which
provides contest exchange information from an external
source, is not considered to be assistance. Of course
one still needs to check that the information is
correct, but that applies equally to Skimmer. SCP is
currently not real time but that is not a inherent
characteristic, and it is entirely possible to imagine
a version which was continually updated during a
contest.

If my understanding of Classical Logic is correct, one
uses philosophical logic but modifies each statement
according to what God would have decided. Sound
familiar?

73 Roger
VE3ZI




      __________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>