N6TR wrote: Technically - the skimmer should still get almost the same
31 it got before - maybe losing a few calls that were too close to each
other in frequency.
I had some 80% DSP CW pile-up decoding in 1990s with 64 x 50 Hz comb but ear
is more selective.
The brain wouldn't take 5-6 calls in 10 seconds mele of 100 callsigns! It
took more time even to W9WNV.
I am glad to see ARRL emphasis on technology while contesters whine on
inevitable Skimmer SDR progress.
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|