CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A)

To: "'reflector cq-contest'" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A)
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:28:50 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There is no such class as 'soa-classic' until some contest sponsor defines
it.

I go with the 'human in the circle' arguments, if its inside your circle and
its not walking and talking then its ok to use it.  


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: K0HB [mailto:k-zero-hb@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 00:04
> To: David Robbins K1TTT; reflector cq-contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A)
> 
> >
> > Right now this
> > is a unique opportunity for cw operators and contesters to show that new
> > technology can make cw contesting interesting, even if you can't decode
> it
> > by ear.
> >
> > David Robbins K1TTT
> >
> 
> David,
> 
> That is a persuasive argument for the use of Skimmer.  I find myself in
> agreement with it.
> 
> But you didn't make ANY argument which persuades me that it belongs in
> SOA-Classic.  If you need assistance copying Morse, what better class than
> the assisted class?
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>