| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rohn 45 vs 55 |
| From: | "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 4 Sep 2008 06:00:01 -0500 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> The Maximum Vertical Downpull spec on the brackets > is slightly different. That would suggest somewhat different size material > is used. I have one of each on the ground and they are easily confused, but Dick's correct, the 55 one is thicker than the 45 one. Mark, N5OT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW, Toni Lindén |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 3830, Peter Voelpel |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rohn 45 vs 55, Dick Green WC1M |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Logs wanted for Super Check Partial, Randy Thompson, K5ZD |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |