CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending the req'd exchange

To: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending the req'd exchange
From: "Richard F DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:37:34 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It was WPX IIRC.....

His proposed "fix" was quite humorous....

73 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 9:04 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Sending the req'd exchange


> If this thread does not die soon, I am going to have to stop reading the 
> Reflector for a while.
>
> Anyhow, was there not a thread here a year or so ago, when some European 
> deliberately omitted the report in some 'Test (CQWW??) because it was 
> already "known"?  That is, everybody KNEW he was gonna send 5NN16 (or "fai 
> nai wuh sis"), or whatever.  And the logging software already had that in 
> the "Exchange Rcvd" field.
>
> So the guy was just running people like crazy, sending only the call sign.
>
> And there was such a stink that maybe he withdrew his log?
>
> We've been here before.
>
> (In SSCW one big-ish gun was not sending his call in the exchange.  So I 
> asked him for it.)
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>