Actually... it kind of does, if a station isn't id'ing enough so that the
skimmer can determine who is cq'ing they won't show up on the skimmer
report.
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Denis Pochuev - K7GK [mailto:k7gk@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 18:02
> To: n4zr@contesting.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Answering an age-old question
>
>
> This is fantastic! Now, can the skimmer network be used to calculate the
> average time it takes for a CQ-ing station to ID?
>
> 73, Denis - K7GK> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:26:17 -0500> To: CQ-
> contest@contesting.com> From: n4zr@contesting.com> Subject: [CQ-Contest]
> Answering an age-old question> > The most recent CQWWCW contest was the
> first in which the Reverse Beacon > Network (http://skimmer.dxwatch.com)
> was using version 1.3 of CW Skimmer, > which reports the signal-to-noise
> ratio of stations received by each > Skimmer-equipped beacon station. It
> dawned on us that this offers, for the > first time, the opportunity to
> answer the age-old question, "Whose [signal] > is bigger."> > Some
> examples:> > Skimmer Freq. Call Date/Time SNR> SV8RV-2 | 7008.1 | N3RS |
> 2355z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 | 7018.2 | KC1XX | 2352z 30 Nov | 4> SV8RV-2 |
> 7006.3 | W3LPL | 2348z 30 Nov | 4>
> ...> or> 73, Pete N4ZR> the World Contest Station Database is back...>
> www.conteststations.com
> _________________________________________________________________
> Send e-mail anywhere. No map, no compass.
> http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_anywh
> ere_122008
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|