Big snip...
> A number of folks suggested that I send a real signal report.
> At first I thought this advice was being given sarcastically
> but now I'm not sure. An honest question: if, in the next
> contest, I send realistic signal reports, are you going to be
> okay with that? Consider this fair warning.
>
More snip...
> W6LX said that.
Go for it. However, please note that you're not exactly breaking new ground
here.
My personal favorite for "honest" and "real" signal reports in contests was
KH6CC now sadly a silent key. Real and honest signal reports in the 160M
contests were all he knew. The sad part is I doubt that any of his contacts
- who just blew by the fact that he gave them a 559 or whatever - ever got
busted score-wise for failing to accurately record what he sent. So send
whatever you want the real question is whether it matters at all on the
scoring/adjudication end. If you send me a 579 and I record the default 599
will I be penalized? That sir, is the question.
Personally, I like the Stew Perry Topband Distance Challenge in terms of
"meaningful" exchanges. If only all contest exchanges and scoring schemes
were so well formulated.
73/Patrick
W7TMT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|