To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Contest Rule Interpretation |
From: | km9m-zig@comcast.net |
Date: | Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I wonder what the going rate is for an attorney to decipher contest rules: - what do they really mean - how far can you "bend" a rule without violating the rule - which contest rules can you choose to follow, and which not I'm sure they'd have a field day interpreting "The Spirit of radio or contesting" That one might even make it to the Supreme Court! 73, Zig - KM9M _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why the 10 min rule anyway?, steve . root |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Swimming and Skimming, Michael Coslo |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] 2009 NAQP RTTY - July - All Final 3830 Claimed Scores, mwdink |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Rule Interpretation, Art Boyars |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |