[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2008 top scores on-line

To: "Barry" <w2up@comcast.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2008 top scores on-line
From: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>
Reply-to: David Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:46:58 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I think DQ's should be at the first of the scores either in print or on the 
web.  I also thought if an operator was switched from Single Operator to 
Assisted that station was to be DQed.

I would like to see more DQ's for unverified contacts.  I found one 
contestant in the CQ WW 160 had 51% uniques after he was given every benefit 
of the doubt.  I used 9% to look more closely at the log.  CQ WW would 
probably set it differently so not to penalize the stations with superior 
antennas et al.

Dave K4JRB
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry" <w2up@comcast.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 12:36 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW 2008 top scores on-line

> Interesting that the DQs are prominently displayed at the top rather
> than in small print at the bottom...

CQ-Contest mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>