CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] More Q Codes for Contest Spotting

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] More Q Codes for Contest Spotting
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:02:27 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And that puts the new Q signal debate in the right light.  Thanks for a bit
of sanity and a good laugh.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: jpescatore@aol.com [mailto:jpescatore@aol.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 11:28
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] More Q Codes for Contest Spotting
> 
> QII? - Are you really P5IOY like the cluster spot said??
> QII - No, I'm WH2Y like anyone who can actually copy CW can easily see.
> 
> 
> QUR? - Will you be giving out your callsign in the next 20 minutes or so,
> or do I have time to get a cup of coffee and a bagel?
> QUR - You can probably grind the coffee and hand roll the dough and
> boil/bake the bagel before I identify next.
> 
> 
> QTL? - Will you answer me in the pileup if I very slowly yell the last two
> letters of my call 7 times?
> QTL - Yes, full callsigns are so inefficient - with SuperCheckPartial
> turned on, I will fill in the rest for you.
> 
> 
> John K3TN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>