CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Something they overlooked

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Something they overlooked
From: VK4TI <vk4ti@wia.org.au>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 13:40:25 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Has possiblities!

I know what the possibilities are and I am sure the co-ordination of the
lynch mob is occurring as I type ... Out of the box thinking - its what
makes us contesters so special :-) 


N7DF wrote:
> 
> There is nothing in the SS rules that says what type of numbering system
> you have to use in the exchange
> 
> Just think how much more interesting it would be if we gave the QSO number
> in Roman numerals and the check in binary
> 
> pse cpy NR XLVIII B N7DF 11110101010 NM
> 
> Has possiblities!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Something-they-overlooked-tp3964816p3965793.html
Sent from the CQ Contesting (Nabble) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>