CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 minute rule for multiplier station in MS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 10 minute rule for multiplier station in MS
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:10:45 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Three words:

Strategy.
Abuse Prevention.

The first is obvious.

The second... well, without something like the 10 minute rule in place,
what's to stop some ethically challenged operators from having more than one
mult station operating, while claiming that there is only one actually in
use?

I see no need for a change.

73

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N7DF
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 7:49 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 10 minute rule for multiplier station in MS

I have always wondered what is the purpose of the 10 minute rule as it
applies to the multiplier station in MS 

 It seems that the purpose of the multiplier station is to maximize the
mults and it is counterproductive to force it to sit on a band that may have
only one multiplier available for 9 and a half minutes when there are
multipliers to be worked on other bands

especially with the packet clusters spotting for multipliers it seems like
this rule is out of date and should be changed to permit unrestricted
roaming of the multiplier station as long as there is only one multiplier
station in use at a time

\
\
\

Remember E=IxR is not just a good idea   IT IS THE LAW

73
Larry
N7DF



      
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>