Hi folks,
I read this and saw my last UBN reports.
There were mistakes like:
YL5W
LY5W
LY4W
DY5W
LU5W
LY5R
LY5M
LY5A
,....
Also looked to cluster spots. Really - more listen, not see to cluster
window only.
Many mistakes were made second contest day, when operator was tired.
Maybe he listening OK, but forgot about changing in LOG?
See ya on 80m this year!
73, Sam LY5W .-.. -.-- ..... .--
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Randy Thompson K5ZD <> wrote:
> Even the simplest call can be mangled in many different ways. Just for
> fun,
> here are all of the variations for LY7A from WPX CW 2009.
>
> DY7A
> IY7A
> LX7A
> LY1A
> LY27A
> LY2A
> LY3A
> LY5A
> LY6A
> LY7AL
> LY7BA
> LY7DA
> LY7M
> LY7T
> LY7Y
> LY7ZA
> LY8A
> RY7A
> SY7A
> YL7A
>
> The most common was LY8A.
>
> This kind of information will be included in the WPX log checking reports
> for every submitted log.
>
> Watch your dots AND dashes!
>
> Randy, K5ZD
>
> > -----dits this weekend
> >
> > Hi,
> > What are you talking about? About dits??? Funny :) Did you
> > feel the difference in CW between "A" and "O" (oscar)? If yes
> > - you are lucky one. Number of contesters not... I can not
> > understand where is this tallent from to copy LY8A insted
> > LY8O ?? We are only two stations with LY8 prefix and one is
> > inactive... Sure there is LY7A, but when I see the mistakes
> > report the number of faulty QSOs is that I was logged as
> > LY8A... and not in the single log... But for some reason the
> > same station could copy my call correct on the other band...
> > So please try to listen for a signal not only watch spot
> > appearances. More attention please.
> >
> > Thanks and CU this weekend.
> >
> > 73, Remi LY8O
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|