CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 83, Issue 54

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 83, Issue 54
From: "W7VJ" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:51:46 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Too early... "pole" was meant to be "poll."  Waking up now.

73

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:08:58 -0800
From: "W7VJ" <w7vj@millerisar.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] WPX M/S Proposed rule change Summary
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Cc: kq2m@earthlink.net
Message-ID: <43C7195864A6481D85389445136BE348@andrewsdesktop>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"

Bob and Nate's comments say it all from my perspective.  If there is no hard
data to support a change in M/S leave it alone (or seek to conduct a poll,
however unscientific that may be)... 

BUT, if it's a matter of creating more "opportunities" as Randy put it,
whatever he meant by that, then why not experiment with a M/1 category and
see how it goes?

Happy Thanksgiving and GL in the WW...

73,

Andrew
W7VJ


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 83, Issue 54, W7VJ <=