CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] A principle to go by when evaluating contest rules.

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] A principle to go by when evaluating contest rules.
From: Scott Currier <scott_currier@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 04:16:10 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>


I think that it is reasonable to have an idea of what you want the contest to 
measure before designing your contest. Start the process by laying out your 
goals. 

As far as the CQ-WW DX contest goes, the contest sponsors state that the 
objective is for Amateurs around the world to contact as many other hams in as 
many zones and countries as possible. 

Ok, that being said, why are continents figured in the scoring? Does figuring 
in continents help or hinder the stated objective?

I think it hinders it because in effect it changes the objective. You now need 
to contact as many hams as possible on OTHER continents. That's not what the 
original objective says. Therefore the scoring system isn't matched properly to 
the objective. 

The real CQ WW Dx objective is to work as many hams around the world in as many 
zones and countries as possible, provided they're on different continents. 

So, what do you have to do now? Easy, get as close to the population centers as 
possible without being on the same continent. 

That monkey wrench of the continent issue really throws things off and creates 
a situation where the winner and person behind him are separated not by who 
worked the most countries or zones but by something not even in the objective 
of the contest. They happened to make a lot more 3point q's because of the 
continent issue. 

If it's not in the objective, why does it have such prominence in the scoring? 
 

WPX is even worse. 

WPX sponsor states that the objective is as follows...

I. Objective: For amateurs world wide to contact as many amateurs 
                and prefixes as possible during the contest period.

If that is the case, then why more points if the other station is on a 
different continent? If the objective is to believed, why more points for use 
of the lower HF bands?

The objective is not to work as many hams and prefixes as possible, it's to 
contact as many hams and prefixes on different continents and on the lower 
bands as possible if you want to get the highest score for the number of 
contacts that you make. 

The scoring is out of line with the contest objective. 

Extra points because of distance, continent, zone, band, or anything else 
aren't part of the objective and therefore don't belong if the objective is to 
be believed, which it clearly is not. 

According to the contest sponsors, the name of the game is prefixes. According 
to the scoring it's prefixes with a rather large disclaimer and strings 
attached. In other words, these prefixes over here are better than those 
prefixes over there. At least for some people. 

If the contest is part dx contest and part prefix contest, put that in the 
objective. 

With that being said, it seems to me that contest rules need to be looked at to 
see if they support the contest objectives or move the contest in a different 
direction. 

After all, without knowing what the sponsors are looking to accomplish, how can 
you tell whether or not a rule makes sense? The objectives are your reference 
point. 

73 all and good contesting. 

Scott Currier KT1B
Haverhill, MA

 





























                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail is faster and more secure than ever.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/hotmail_bl1/hotmail_bl1.aspx?ocid=PID23879::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-ww:WM_IMHM_1:092009
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>