CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Clarity in contest categories.

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Clarity in contest categories.
From: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:01:36 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>


Scott Currier wrote:
>  Likewise a second operator is not a spotting system. 
> 
> I agree with you for the most part, eccept for the above.
> A second operator can scan the bands for you and spot multipliers, not a
> problem. If I'm not mistaken, that's how they did it back in the day (I'm
> still quiet young so I'm not sure on that one ;-)).
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222984/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> 


-----


Maarten, PD2R
Member of the PI4DX contest group
www.pi4dx.com

Elecraft K3 nr:1849
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Clarity-in-contest-categories-tp4175343p4175575.html
Sent from the CQ Contesting (Nabble) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>