CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] A Decent Rate?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] A Decent Rate?
From: Stephen & Marilyn Haines <steveandmarilynhaines@gmail.com>
Reply-to: stevehaines@pobox.com
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:16:40 -0300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The ARRL DXCW contest was my best contest effort so far. After casually 
contesting since 2007 with only a search-and-pounce style, I finally 
worked up enough nerve to call CQ. The pileup surprised and buried me -- 
I may have been the only ZP in the test. That happens if no one comes 
down to run Tom's station, ZP0R.

Here's my question: Given my conditions, what would be a competent QSO 
rate during a run? I averaged between 1.5 to 2 QSOs per minute, with a 
few minutes reaching 3. I know I frustrated a lot of of the guys at this 
pace, but I never felt like I had control of the pile.

I'm 63, with 50 years as a casual CW operator comfortable at 25-30 wpm. 
My rig is a Yaesu FT-757GXii with a factory 600 hz narrow filter. The 
antenna is a ground plane 10 feet from a two-story house, with wire 
elements for 15 and 20 taped to a fiberglass fishing pole. It's got 3 
radials on 20 and 1 on 15. My signal is always weak; 100 watts to a wire 
is what I've always had. When I operate split I can usually set up a 
rhythm, but in the test with a simplex frequency I couldn't be heard in 
the racket of nearly continuous callers.

So what would be a reasonable personal goal under these conditions? From 
you experienced guys, what QSO rate would  a competent (not world-class) 
operator achieve?

Steve, ZP9EH/W9CPI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>