I seem to remember that Samuel FB Morse started out with a "Code Reader"
- i.e. Ink Pen driven by his relays, which the operators read and put
down onto the Latin Alphabet. They "learned" audio code by osmosis -
learning they didn't need to ink reader.
Methinks we'd not have much competition with a Morse reader, and it
"probably" would be a way to encourage folks to learn to "read the code"
via audio instead of via a computer. I don't believe a computer can
"read" randomly generated CW nearly as well as the vacuum between a good
CW operator's ears.
Of course, a CW skimmer, et. cetera., which looks at the entire spectrum
and finds the "rare ones" is definitely an aid which puts its use beyond
the pale of SO category.
Lettuce B real - and encourage, not discourage the newcomers.
Or, we'll find CW dyiing off with the aging population of the CW ops.
73 DE n8xx Hg
On 5/27/2010 10:20 PM, cw-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 11:54:50 +0100
> From: "Paul O'Kane"<pokane@ei5di.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests
> To:<CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Macon"<tmacon@wi.rr.com>
>
>> - Should the use of CW decoders be disallowed by sponsors, or should there
>> be a separate entry category for entrants that use them?
>>
> I don't know Russian, so I can't have a conversation in Russian. The only
> way I can communicate with a Russian speaker is to use a decoder - human or
> otherwise. Although I may have had two-way communications with a Russian
> speaker, it has not been in Russian.
>
> In the same way, any contester with a decoder can have two-way communications
> with a CW operator, but that does not mean they have had a CW QSO.
>
> Using a decoder reduces CW to the status of "just another data mode".
>
>
>> - Can CW entries that use a decoder be considered digital entries?
>>
> Yes. I suggested previously it be described as DM01, data/digital mode 01,
> to distinguish if from other data modes - for example RTTY (DM02), Amtor
> (DM03) etc.
>
>> - Have any contests disallowed CW decoders or put them in a separate entry
>> category?
>>
> Well, Skimmer is a CW decoder, and is not permitted in contests with a
> SO-unassisted category.
>
>> - If a contest introduced such rules (to prohibit decoders), how might it
>> affect the perception of that
>> contest in the contest community?
>>
>>
> It's likely that the only objectors would be those who don't know CW.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|