CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Public logs, public perception

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public logs, public perception
From: "Gary K9GS" <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Reply-to: Gary K9GS <garyk9gs@wi.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:25:43 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Art...regardless about how one feels about public logs your comments are 
silly.

It's not up to the contesting public to determine if someone is 
cheating...that's the function and purpose of the log checking process.  A 
perfect example is the recent flap over the IARU HQ competition.  The last 
thing we need are people combing public logs looking for suspected cases of 
cheating.  Using your logic, we shouldn't check logs at all...just leave 
that up to the public and post results using raw log data.

73,

-Gary K9GS
GMDXA Web Site:  www.gmdxa.org


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Art Boyars" <artboyars@gmail.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2010 7:55 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Public logs, public perception


> There are some aspects of the "public log" issue that are really tough
> calls.  But consider this:  If you are unwilling to open your log, people
> will not know whether or not you are cheating.  And not everybody who
> wonders will be a warped little mind deserving only disdain or pity.
>
> Good thing this only a hobby, eh?
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>