I didn't miss the point. I just don't share your conclusion.
Just to set my position: I believe that ANY spotting is too much, but the
charge of "cheerleading" seems misplaced in this case.
"Cheerleaders" typically spot their "friend" almost exclusively, but both
the accused here (UA9's) also spotted pretty much every other R3 that was
on.
My guess is that proximity is the explanation in this case, not some
nefarious scheme as LU5DX proposes.
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Proud Member of:
A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
MWA - http://www.W0AA.org
TCDXA - http://www.tcdxa.org
CADXA - http://www.cadxa.org
LVDXA - http://www.lvdxa.org
CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
TCFMC - http://tcfmc.org
--
Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW participant
,
>
>> I'm guessing that the fourteen "1's" are busted calls.
>
> Once again, you've missed the point. One WRTC station
> had some 75 spots more than the least spotted station.
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|