To: | Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge@adinet.com.uy> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 IARU Pre-checking your log... |
From: | k3bu@optimum.net |
Reply-to: | k3bu@optimum.net |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:26:25 +0000 (GMT) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> And why do you think the top stations prioritized the CW QSO´s? > Because of > the low power used? > > 73, > Jorge > CX6VM/CW5W >From my last WRTC experience (2000) problem with SSB was that bands are filled >with kW/stacked beams HQ stations perpetual CQing their heads off, leaving >little room for little FD WRTC stations to get decent frequency for runs. (1 >stn/2 kHz) CW with low power and narrower bandwidth can still get decent runs (5 stns/1 kHz) IARU is turning into HQ's contest. 73 Yuri K3BU.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspottinganditsimpact, Paul O'Kane |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Reasonable expections... was Cheerleaders and the impact, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 IARU Pre-checking your log..., Julius Fazekas |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 IARU Pre-checking your log..., Jorge Diez - CX6VM |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |