This is exactly why I argue against people saving milliseconds by
speeding up the sending of "5NN" on CW - in tough conditions it negates
the value of setting up your brain for the real data to come.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 7/21/2010 10:26 PM, Dale Putnam wrote:
> Yes, it is historic, and Randy is right. However, another way of looking at
> it, for voice or cw.... is that it sets the ear(s) to listen to the following
> with a whole lot more precision, and accuracy, (two different aspects) so the
> following important information can be heard and comprehended, and reacted to
> effectively and effeciently. Another way of looking at it, is that the 599,
> voice or cw, allows the rx brain to adjust the automatic filters to
> compensate for the qrn/qsb/qrm and allow the best possible reception, like
> using an audio filter and adjusting it with the controls available, for the
> best information transfer or most effective information transfer possible.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|