For a better understanding, I am intending to work the SAC SSB Contest as a
Non-Scandinavian, and then our aim is to WORK ONLY Scandinavian stations,
collecting call areas as multipliers. This means that another SSB Contest
the same weekend will definitely mess things upp for the SAC Contest.
If Non-Scandinavians participate in the Brazilian Contest and just work one
or a few Scandinavians (causal operation) and only submit a log for the
Brazilian contest, the Scandinaian station will get penalties because of
unverifiable contacts in their own contest.
One major SSB contest using the same time of contest exchange (serial
numbers) is more than enough... To have two contests with idential contest
exchanges creates a mess. If your new contest had any other kind of
messages, it would have simplified for both you and the Scandinavians.
73 de R3/SM6LRR
2010/10/1 Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr@gmail.com>
> Hello Muniz,
>
> I do not agree at all...
>
> Multipliers in the 52 years old Scandinavian Activity Contest are
> Scandinavian call areas, while this new Brazilian invention is using DXCC
> countries as multipliers.
>
> Before launching the CQ SSB CONTEST SA, it would have been good to check
> WA7BNM and SM3CER Contest Calendars, so see if the weekend October 9-10 was
> available as a potential weekend for your brandnew contest.
>
> I am not against the new South American Contest, but to start a completely
> new contest requires a little bit of survey to see what other contests are
> taking place the same weekend.
>
> It is not enough to just create a home page, copy and paste rules from any
> other "World Wide Contest", make some marketing and think there will be no
> confusion.
>
> It is not at all ideal that a brand new SSB contest is appearing on the
> same weekend as SAC SSB (52 years history).
>
> CQ WW RTTY made the same mistake as CQ SSB CONTEST SA when that contest all
> of a sudden appeard on a weekend when SAC SSB always had been on for
> decades. However, this is a little different, because we are talking about a
> tuly different mode.
>
> SAC SSB realized that the popularity of the CQ WW RTTY Contest was
> increasing year by year. We therefore realized that we needed to move to a
> seemingly free SSB contest weekend.
>
> Now, 8 days ago, I for the first time receive your invitation to take part
> in your new contest. Thank you very much - but timing is not very
> professionally planned. This applies to both the weekend you chooose without
> looking into the two recognized contest calendars (WA7BNM and SM3CER), as
> your very late marketing of the contest.
>
> I do not think this is professional from the Brazilian side!
>
> SM6LRR, Mats
>
>
>
> 2010/10/1 Muniz Pepy <py2zy@ymail.com>
>
> Hello friends,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Friends who participate in the contest scandinavia may send their logs for
>> the
>> CQ SSB CONTEST SA, because the formats are equal, just have to change the
>> category that participated. For some categories are different or not
>> exist. So
>> we have two competitions in one ....... 73all
>>
>> www.brcontest.com
>>
>> PY2ZY - Muniz - Cantareira Dx Group
>> http://cantareiradx.com
>>
>>
>> CDX # 0001
>> 30MDG#1767
>> EPC#5645
>> FH#1743
>> CDG#0173
>> DMC#1861
>> Qrz Member
>> Eqsl Member
>> LTOW active
>>
>> WWW.BRCONTEST.COM <http://www.brcontest.com/> novo site de
>> contest Brasileiro
>> LISTA CDX AQUI !!!
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|