Yes, this is the crucial question. Understand that log checking is going to
give the nod to the sent exchange when the received exchange differs. But
... that doesn't mean the sent exchange is what is in the sender's log! So,
sometimes the innocent (who truly logged what was sent) gets dinged. Life
is unfair, but trust me, far more log check errors are in your favor than
vice versa.
73,
Ed
-------------------------
Ed Muns - W0YK
www.w0yk.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Iain
> MacDonnell - N6ML
> Sent: Thursday, 28 October, 2010 21:18
> To: Hank Garretson
> Cc: David Levine; CQ Contesting Reflector; RTTY Reflector
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 4:06 AM, Hank Garretson <w6sx@arrl.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Iain MacDonnell - N6ML
> > <ar@dseven.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I thought I must have manually typed it (as opposed to clicking on
> >> it), and goofed, but apparently he really was sending sending "T0M"
> >> (with a zero).
> >
> >
> > A good reason to use a slash-zero font in your print window.
>
> But that brings up the age-old question ... do you log what
> he sent, or what you think is what he really meant to send?
>
> ~Iain / N6ML
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|