CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend....

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend....
From: Barry <w2up@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:09:06 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it's OK for a single-op 
(unassisted) to post spots, but not receive them.  IIRC, CT has this 
functionality built in.
Barry W2UP

On 12/1/2010 7:30 AM, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote:
> If the unscrupulous person was a single op (not assisted) he would have to
> be doubly unscrupulous to have an open packet/internet connection available
>   to spot the guy.
>
> If the person was assisted (single op or multi) it would be a sign of
> scrupulousness that he wanted to verify the callsign from the sending  
> station,
> not from third party spotting information.
>
> 73  -  Jim   K8MR
>
>
-- 

Barry Kutner, W2UP             Lakewood, CO

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>