CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest

To: Steve Hanlon <asciibaron@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest
From: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:46:46 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Steve;

Go for it. Then wonder why you guys could only manage to get 74  
sections!

:-) :-) :-)

As usual, we are in agreement here. Always leave the stations in the  
log, and work everyone you can...
And we will be working as many PVRC stations as possible again next  
year in Sweepstakes. Contesting does not exist without cooperation.  
That makes us rather unique!

Jack Brindle, W6FB
President, NCCC


On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Steve Hanlon wrote:

>
> a slight modification of this will be for all PVRC stations to work  
> as many NCCC stations as possible in SS next year but to not log  
> them.  a great offense is a solid defense :)
>
> all joking aside, i think you have missed the mark here.  Art has no  
> idea if the station has him in the log or not.  we are supposed to  
> be communicating but unless the other station has confirmed that we  
> have in fact communicated, how do you know you have?  Art is not  
> going to claim he as communicated if he doesn't know that he has.   
> makes perfect sense to me.
>
> -Steve, WM3O
>
> Dec 3, 2010 08:51:45 AM, W5OV@W5OV.COM wrote:
>
> OK Art, so let me see if I understand you correctly...
>
> You're submitting your log, with some QSOS intentionally removed,  
> because
> someone who did not respond how you wanted them to, in order to
> intentionally stick it to them ("I want them to suffer the penalty")?
>
> Wow. I hope this doesn't catch on.
>
> 73,
>
> Bob W5OV
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Art Boyars
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:26 PM
> To: pvrc@mailman.qth.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest
>
> We had important out-of-town company thru the Thanksgiving weeked  
> (until
> Tuesday evening), so I did not get to make my trek to the W3LPL MM.   
> All I
> got to do was an hour or so of here-and-there demonstration QSOs  
> ("This is
> ham radio contesting").  CT says 49 QSOs, 18 Zones, 31  Countries,  
> 6,566
> Points.  All S&P of the loud guys, except for a short attempt as a  
> fresh
> meat CQer on high up on 20M Sunday.  That got me a Ukrainian and a  
> VE1, who
> I hope will remember me in SS CW  :>).
>
> I just submitted the log, not because my club will benefit from the  
> points,
> but because a couple of those big guns I worked did not, after a few
> repeats, give me a clear indication that they copied my call/ 
> report.  They
> are not in my log, and I want them to suffer the penalty if they  
> claim the
> QSO.
>
> I did work one USA station, a K1 who thought I was answering his CQ,  
> when I
> was actually calling the European right next to him.  I hope the K1  
> keeps me
> in his log.
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>