CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] RTTY Contesting in CW segment?

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] RTTY Contesting in CW segment?
From: "Brobakken, Stein Roar" <s-roabr@online.no>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 22:20:40 +0100
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Hi

If you don't know JA have new bandplan for RTTY!
You don't need to work low on 80m or 40m anymore!
73s LA6FJA Rag

*******


This is a e-mail from 7L4IOU I got..

Hi Rag

Japanese RTTY segments are follows:

3.520-3.530MHz
3.520 - 3.525 is main segment
3.525 - 3.530 yes but SSB QRM at evening, 
              ok for EU at midnight and morning

3.599-3.612MHz
yes but SSB QRM at evening.
hope more DX activitys up 3.600

7.025-7.045MHz RTTY
7.025 - 7.030 PSK at usual
7.030 - 7.035 RTTY, yes but SSTV QRM
7.100-7.200MHz mainly for domestics QSO, DX has not seen.

I hope to see you on low bands.

73 Hisami 7L4IOU


-----Opprinnelig melding-----
Fra: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] På
vegne av Bill, W6WRT
Sendt: 5. desember 2010 23:34
Til: rtty@contesting.com
Emne: Re: [RTTY] Why is 40 Meter contesting in CW segment?

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:34:56 -0000, "John Barber GW4SKA"
<ska@bartg.org.uk> wrote:

>The Region 1 bandplan at 
>http://www.iaru-r1.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=173&func=star
tdown&id=67 
>shows:
>7000 - 7040    CW only
>7040 - 7050    Digital modes only
>7050 - 7200    All modes
>
>RTTY contesters can go anywhere up from 7040 but not below. CW ops can use 
>anywhere in the band EXCEPT 7040-7050.

REPLY:

A further complication is that JA stations are limited to below 7045.
This makes the "sweet spot" fall between 7040-7045, just 5 kHz. 

73, Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>