I understood Maarten's original question to be whether he could submit two
separate logs (for separate Single Band Operations) using the same call.
I believe the answer to that is no but it is always best to confirm these
things for ARRL events with KX9X.
73,
Al, K0AD
In a message dated 3/4/2011 6:05:50 A.M. Central Standard Time,
w5ov@w5ov.com writes:
Yes.
This is called "Multi-Two" or "Multi-Operator, Two Transmitter".
Here's what you "mist" (sic):
2.3.2.Multioperator, Two Transmitter:
2.3.2.1.A maximum of two transmitted signals at any given time, on
different bands.
2.3.2.2.Each transmitter is limited to 6 band changes (maximum) in any
clock hour. Unused band changes from radio one may not be transferred to
radio two.
2.3.2.2.1.The clock hour is from zero through 59 minutes.
2.3.2.2.2.Band changes are defined so that, for example, a change from 20
meters to 40 meters and then back to 20 meters constitutes two band
changes.
2.3.2.2.3.Violation of the 6-band change rule or improper logging will
result in an entry reclassification to the Multioperator Multitransmitter
class.
2.3.2.3.Both transmitters may work any and all stations; the second
transmitter is not limited to working new multipliers only. However, a
station may only be worked once per band regardless of which transmitter
is used.
2.3.2.4.Each of the two transmitters must keep a separate, chronological
log for the entire contest period.
2.3.2.5.The Cabrillo log must indicate which transmitter made each QSO in
this category.
> Contesters,
>
> Just wandering about this one:
> Is it possible for two single operators, lets say one SO on 40 meter and
> the
> other SO on 20 meter, to use the same club call sign during the upcomming
> ARRL International DX contest?
> I guess there could be some problems when submitting the logs to the
> robot.
> There is a good chance the robot will only use the last uploaded log and
> disregard the log which was oploaded first since both logs are submitted
> with the same call sign.
>
> Can't find anthing in the rules about this one (yes, I have read all
3(!)
> sets of rules on the ARRL website;-)) but I could have mist it.
>
> Best 73,
>
> Maarten PD2R
>
>
>
>
> --
> dldledememt
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|