CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?

To: burbidge terence <terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
From: somata90924@mypacks.net
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:58:14 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
if people would be HONEST WE WOULD not have to be bothered by all 
this,,skimmers,,internet, cheaters, SPOTS,,,,,bahhhhhh humbug.  Guess we have 
lost that as a society, ever watch how many people never STOP at a STOP SIGN?

joe w6vnr/zf2ah

-----Original Message-----
>From: burbidge terence <terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>
>Sent: Mar 18, 2011 7:21 AM
>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
>
><<I would describe recordings, whether of a whole
>band or from individual stations, as technology
>which inherently inhibits cheating, in contrast
>to some other technologies which facilitate
>cheating.>>
>Great idea. Perhaps we could employ a firm of forensic experts to replay and
>report on the recordings? Even simpler, let's set up a 'Star Chamber' of
>distinguished contesters to investigate. Not just cheating but also
>behaviour. For example, start/stop the clock when an SO2R/VFO leaves his run
>frequency to make Q elsewhere and someone like me jumps in and steals it.
>
>Maybe take the Star Chamber findings to the International Court, complete
>with the 'usual suspects' who could then be interrogated and eventually
>tried for their offences.
>
>For goodness sake!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Terry
>G4MKP
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>