I don't think there's any purity one way or the other - it just makes
clear what you're reporting. Some logging programs report the clock hour
rates only in their summaries. Qrate reports both.
>> clock hour vs Qrate-hour
>
>
> There seems to be a perception that one of these is, in some way, more
> "pure" than the other. Why?
>
> What's the difference if you have a 400 hour from 0000z to 0059z, or a 400
> hour from 0003z to 0102z? You still worked 400 guys in an hour, right?
>
> Idle curiosity....
>
>
>
> 73, Mike K9NW
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|