Brett,
OK. I wonder how long this will last?
I was complaining about the defective Cabrillo logging system. Everything
I said was the truth.
After 5 decades plus of contesting, I thought I was entitled.
73
Paul N4XM
At 04:38 AM 10/1/2011 +0000, you wrote:
>Paul:
>
>> In the past my posts that I commented about were absolutely blocked by the
>> reflector caretakers.
>
>As I expected.
>
>> One of 2--K1KI and the guy who used to write the contest column for CQ.
>
>And yes, the other is K1AR.
>
>BTW, your reply was to me & not the list. Not much point in two people
>talking to themselves about the censorship... they made the mistake of
>letting us get a foot in the door, let's take advantage of it. ;^)
>
>73, Brett/p.
>
>> At 02:28 AM 10/1/2011 +0000, you wrote:
>>> ZL2TZE added:
>>>
>>>> Look at the REPLY address when making a reply in THIS FORUM !!! all
>>>> REPLIES
>>>> go to the SENDER of the message you are
>>>> replying to and also I note that any message with anything but TEXT
>>>> in it
>>>> doesn't get through .. PYPHON rulz :-(
>>>>
>>>> Make sure that you check the reply address and send TEXT only !!!
>>>
>>> I receive the digest, which does not have a reply-to header - so replies
>>> to that rely on the poster's mail client using the address of the sender
>>> of the digest.
>>>
>>> My guess is that those who do not receive the digest receive something
>>> that contains a reply-to header that has the list & the original
>>> poster's address in it. I say that because sometimes I get replies from
>>> folks to my posts here & sometimes their reply does not appear on the
>>> list (but I see what they had tried to post as it was also directly
>>> addressed to me). I rather doubt that every single time, every single
>>> person hits the reply-to-all button.
>>>
>>> No HTML to be seen in any of those messages - instead the only
>>> explanation I can think of is that the censors censored that person's
>>> post. The last time that happened was when I pointed out that maybe
>>> there was abuse of CEPT in contests & I found it amusing that the
>>> censors stopped a reply by a prolific participant here that seemed to
>>> indicate he thought the oft-mentioned "boy & his radio" does not need
>>> any licence or authorization to operate.
>>>
>>> If this post is also censored, then everyone I added to the distribution
>>> will know it happened. Usually, only the poster knows because like a CQ
>>> WW entry, it vanishes from the results. On rare occasions, the censors
>>> even say something about it to the censored. Maybe VE5RA & N4XM would
>>> be so kind & let us know if they thought their missing posts could be
>>> due to ZL2TZE's suggested reply-to or embedded HTML issues.
>>>
>>> 73, ex-VR2BG/p.
>>>
>>>> -------Original Message-------
>>>>
>>>> From: N4XM Paul D. Schrader
>>>> Date: 09/30/11 14:53:46
>>>> To: vr2bg@harts.org.hk; ":"@contesting.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CAC ..... was "radio-sport.net web site
>>>> or, copy
>>>> and paste journalism
>>>>
>>>> You are correct. I have had submissions to the reflector blocked.
>>>> And have been ignored at ARRL and CQ at times.
>>>>
>>>> Paul N4XM
>>>>
>>>> At 03:37 AM 9/25/2011 +0000, you wrote:
>>>>> W5OV said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We have forums like CQ Contest and others where the public can express
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> opinions freely - and they (we) do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely not true.
>>>>>
>>>>> Somebody controls what can be said on cq-contest & as just noted by
>>>>> E73M, sounds like posts are still disappearing like entries in CQ WW
>>>>> results.
>>>>>
>>>>> And there is nothing else like cq-contest that I am aware of.
>>>>>
>>>>> As a whole, the way things in amateur radio (not just radiosport) are
>>>>> done is quite authoritarian & will be familiar to anyone unfortunate to
>>>>> live where that is how things are done. We are to know what we are
>>>>> told, who decides this & everything else is not us & they do so from
>>>>> some distance from those they rule over - a model for going about
>>>>> things
>>>>> that man improved upon centuries ago.
>>>>>
>>>>> (AR) [didahdidahdit], ex-VR2BG/p.
>>>>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|