If you want to really get the message across, work the station again and
send CALL PSE OM or something like that. Even a harmless question mark or
two can get the message across. No running station is going to want to
have his choice of infrequent IDing slow down the rate. I think it's
reasonable to wait a QSO or two before asking, but I also think it's
reasonable to ask. Also, the habit of some calling stations to give up
after 30 seconds if not answered immediately encourages a running station
to assume that all callers know his call and that he's doing them a favor
by not IDing so that they don't have to wait around as long (or give up on
the QSO before it happened).
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Edward Sawyer <SawyerEd@earthlink.net>wrote:
> Yuri, No that is not what I am saying. I am saying that the offender has
> not delivered on his obligation of the valid Q by not signing. And
> therefore while the Q is "loggable" it ultimately fails to be logged
> because
> the callsign is not there. The fact that he thinks its done is his
> problem,
> not my problem.
>
>
>
> Competitive contesters will learn from climbing UBNs and modify their
> behavior. Heck, these guys probably already have bad UBNs because ops are
> logging packet spots which are bad enough that they won't show up in the
> expected log in many cases.
>
>
>
> Ed N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|