It's still in the rules for ARRL Sweepstakes (rule 2.7). I thought it was in
the WPX rules, but I don't see it there.
73, Dick WC1M
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 4, 2012, at 3:47 AM, "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> There is no way to put listening time into a cabrillo log. The log
> checkers run their own time calculation off the cabrillo. So is the
> listening time rule still on the books? If it is, it can't be sent in
> or tabulated. I don't think I've seen that in rules in a long time.
> Someone know better?
>
> 73, Guy.
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Dick Green <wc1m73@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Depends on the contest and whether you count the editing time as part of the
>> break.
>>
>> If it's an unlimited operating time contest, like CQ WW, then editing during
>> the contest could cut into your operating time, rate, number of QSOs, etc.,
>> so it's perfectly OK. If it happens that the editing occurs during a break
>> in which you wouldn't be operating anyway (bands closed, too tired, etc.),
>> then that's OK, too. Bottom line, if you edit during the contest, it's OK.
>>
>> But if it's a time-limited contest, like WPX or SS, then if you edit during
>> break time you are effectively extending your operating time past the limit,
>> so it's not OK. It's true that the loggers don't start your operating clock
>> until the first QSO after a break, but the rules always say that "listening
>> counts as operating" and the log is supposed to reflect that. I would say
>> "editing counts as operating.
>>
>> 73, Dick WC1M
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> On Aug 3, 2012, at 3:27 PM, "Guy Olinger K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>>> How would you view editing them coming back from a break, but before
>>> you started calling CQ again?
>>>
>>> 73, Guy.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:37 AM, Dick Green <wc1m73@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've never been in favor of super-strict interpretation of the rules, but
>>>> I think one can make a legitimate argument that *any* editing of the log
>>>> after the contest constitutes operating outside the time limits of the
>>>> contest.
>>>>
>>>> Consider this: you typo when entering a call and notice it a few QSOs
>>>> later. You make a note to correct the log entry after the contest. Why
>>>> didn't you stop and make the correction when you noticed it? Ah, but that
>>>> would have caused you to lose time that you would otherwise have spent
>>>> working stations or looking for new ones. If you were running stations at
>>>> 200/hr, your rate would drop precipitously and you would lose several QSOs
>>>> while editing. In effect, you are using time after the contest to maintain
>>>> rate and work more stations during the contest.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Dick WC1M
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 2, 2012, at 3:00 PM, "cq-contest-request@contesting.com"
>>>> <cq-contest-request@contesting.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Send CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to
>>>>> cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>>> cq-contest-request@contesting.com
>>>>>
>>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>>> cq-contest-owner@contesting.com
>>>>>
>>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>>>> than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest digest..."
>>>>> Today's Topics:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Re: New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes (Kelly Taylor)
>>>>> 2. Re: New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>> (Stan Stockton)
>>>>> 3. Re: New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes (Radio K0HB)
>>>>> 4. JIDX 2011 Phone contest result (Takao Kumagai)
>>>>> 5. I just noticed.... redux (Radio K0HB)
>>>>> 6. Re: I just noticed.... redux (Paul Stoetzer)
>>>>> I would agree with Hans, but would add that the 'log' isn't just what you
>>>>> type into the computer. I would argue that if you write out a note during
>>>>> the contest correcting an entry, that note becomes part of your log no
>>>>> differently than if you had, in the paper days, scribbled a correction
>>>>> beside the log entry.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see scribbling that note as being any different than cursor-arrow
>>>>> up
>>>>> to the correctable entry, knowing that some programs are easier to edit on
>>>>> the fly than others. It shows you DID copy it correctly during the
>>>>> contest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have any problem with editing *during* the contest? Let's say
>>>>> you log K0SB and then try to work K0HB later in the contest and get a QSO
>>>>> B4, and are able to determine that you goofed the first time around.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think contests are typing competitions any more than contests were
>>>>> penmanship competitions in the paper days.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, kelly
>>>>> ve4xt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/1/12 4:48 PM, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would disagree that grooming your log /post contest/ with an audio
>>>>>> recording is acceptable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe that my log ought to reflect what I actually recorded IN THE
>>>>>> HEAT
>>>>>> OF BATTLE. No exceptions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: LY8O
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:57 PM
>>>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello ALL,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I can not believe I will be not able to use my own audio
>>>>>> recordings
>>>>>> after the contest (what I am doing very rare and just for the really
>>>>>> questionable moments which are very few) I take a look to the
>>>>>> http://www.cqww.com/rules.php and has found something different from
>>>>>> Phillip
>>>>>> was wrote.
>>>>>> Here is a part of the text:
>>>>>> "<snip> post-contest modification of a log by using data sources to
>>>>>> correct
>>>>>> call sign/exchange errors and "rubber clocking" by the entrant." (chapter
>>>>>> XIII, part C, nr. 3).
>>>>>> There is nothing about usage of the own audio records... All other text
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> 100% acceptable for me as well as a new log sending period of 5 days (7
>>>>>> could be easier to remember for the human IMHO :) ).
>>>>>> Will look forward for more clear explanations from CC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, Remi LY8O
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ZL2TZE wrote:
>>>>>> New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>> Posted on Radio-sport.net
>>>>>> Along with instituting a new five day log submission deadline, the CQ WW
>>>>>> Contest Committee has included a specific rule change for the 2012 CQ WW
>>>>>> DX
>>>>>> Contests that seeks to crack down on post contest log changes.
>>>>>> "Post-contest
>>>>>> correcting of call signs by using any database, recordings or confirming
>>>>>> QSO's
>>>>>> is not allowed."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 Phillip
>>>>>> ZL2TZE
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thought it said database, recordings or confirming QSOs. If so, make all
>>>>> the notes you want and fix post contest. Should not be an issue
>>>>>
>>>>> Stan, K5GO
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from Stan's IPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 1, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would agree with Hans, but would add that the 'log' isn't just what you
>>>>>> type into the computer. I would argue that if you write out a note during
>>>>>> the contest correcting an entry, that note becomes part of your log no
>>>>>> differently than if you had, in the paper days, scribbled a correction
>>>>>> beside the log entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see scribbling that note as being any different than
>>>>>> cursor-arrow up
>>>>>> to the correctable entry, knowing that some programs are easier to edit
>>>>>> on
>>>>>> the fly than others. It shows you DID copy it correctly during the
>>>>>> contest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does anyone have any problem with editing *during* the contest? Let's say
>>>>>> you log K0SB and then try to work K0HB later in the contest and get a QSO
>>>>>> B4, and are able to determine that you goofed the first time around.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think contests are typing competitions any more than contests
>>>>>> were
>>>>>> penmanship competitions in the paper days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, kelly
>>>>>> ve4xt
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 8/1/12 4:48 PM, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would disagree that grooming your log /post contest/ with an audio
>>>>>>> recording is acceptable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that my log ought to reflect what I actually recorded IN THE
>>>>>>> HEAT
>>>>>>> OF BATTLE. No exceptions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: LY8O
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:57 PM
>>>>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log
>>>>>>> Changes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello ALL,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because I can not believe I will be not able to use my own audio
>>>>>>> recordings
>>>>>>> after the contest (what I am doing very rare and just for the really
>>>>>>> questionable moments which are very few) I take a look to the
>>>>>>> http://www.cqww.com/rules.php and has found something different from
>>>>>>> Phillip
>>>>>>> was wrote.
>>>>>>> Here is a part of the text:
>>>>>>> "<snip> post-contest modification of a log by using data sources to
>>>>>>> correct
>>>>>>> call sign/exchange errors and "rubber clocking" by the entrant."
>>>>>>> (chapter
>>>>>>> XIII, part C, nr. 3).
>>>>>>> There is nothing about usage of the own audio records... All other text
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> 100% acceptable for me as well as a new log sending period of 5 days (7
>>>>>>> could be easier to remember for the human IMHO :) ).
>>>>>>> Will look forward for more clear explanations from CC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73, Remi LY8O
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ZL2TZE wrote:
>>>>>>> New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>>> Posted on Radio-sport.net
>>>>>>> Along with instituting a new five day log submission deadline, the CQ WW
>>>>>>> Contest Committee has included a specific rule change for the 2012 CQ
>>>>>>> WW DX
>>>>>>> Contests that seeks to crack down on post contest log changes.
>>>>>>> "Post-contest
>>>>>>> correcting of call signs by using any database, recordings or confirming
>>>>>>> QSO's
>>>>>>> is not allowed."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73 Phillip
>>>>>>> ZL2TZE
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed, Kelly. I'd consider a correction note scribbled in the midst of
>>>>> the contest as perfectly within both the letter and spirit of the
>>>>> competition (unless that note was "check my audio recording on that weak
>>>>> callsign at 2109Z" <grin>)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Kelly Taylor
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 11:07 PM
>>>>> To: Radio K0HB ; ly8o@ot.lt ; cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>
>>>>> I would agree with Hans, but would add that the 'log' isn't just what you
>>>>> type into the computer. I would argue that if you write out a note during
>>>>> the contest correcting an entry, that note becomes part of your log no
>>>>> differently than if you had, in the paper days, scribbled a correction
>>>>> beside the log entry.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't see scribbling that note as being any different than cursor-arrow
>>>>> up
>>>>> to the correctable entry, knowing that some programs are easier to edit on
>>>>> the fly than others. It shows you DID copy it correctly during the
>>>>> contest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone have any problem with editing *during* the contest? Let's say
>>>>> you log K0SB and then try to work K0HB later in the contest and get a QSO
>>>>> B4, and are able to determine that you goofed the first time around.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think contests are typing competitions any more than contests were
>>>>> penmanship competitions in the paper days.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, kelly
>>>>> ve4xt
>>>>>
>>>>> On 8/1/12 4:48 PM, "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I would disagree that grooming your log /post contest/ with an audio
>>>>>> recording is acceptable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe that my log ought to reflect what I actually recorded IN THE
>>>>>> HEAT
>>>>>> OF BATTLE. No exceptions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: LY8O
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 6:57 PM
>>>>>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello ALL,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because I can not believe I will be not able to use my own audio
>>>>>> recordings
>>>>>> after the contest (what I am doing very rare and just for the really
>>>>>> questionable moments which are very few) I take a look to the
>>>>>> http://www.cqww.com/rules.php and has found something different from
>>>>>> Phillip
>>>>>> was wrote.
>>>>>> Here is a part of the text:
>>>>>> "<snip> post-contest modification of a log by using data sources to
>>>>>> correct
>>>>>> call sign/exchange errors and "rubber clocking" by the entrant." (chapter
>>>>>> XIII, part C, nr. 3).
>>>>>> There is nothing about usage of the own audio records... All other text
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> 100% acceptable for me as well as a new log sending period of 5 days (7
>>>>>> could be easier to remember for the human IMHO :) ).
>>>>>> Will look forward for more clear explanations from CC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, Remi LY8O
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ZL2TZE wrote:
>>>>>> New CQ WW DX Rule Bans Post-Contest Log Changes
>>>>>> Posted on Radio-sport.net
>>>>>> Along with instituting a new five day log submission deadline, the CQ WW
>>>>>> Contest Committee has included a specific rule change for the 2012 CQ WW
>>>>>> DX
>>>>>> Contests that seeks to crack down on post contest log changes.
>>>>>> "Post-contest
>>>>>> correcting of call signs by using any database, recordings or confirming
>>>>>> QSO's
>>>>>> is not allowed."
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73 Phillip
>>>>>> ZL2TZE
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>> --
>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>> --
>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>> --
>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear contest lovers
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I uploaded the 2011 JIDX-PHONE contest result on the web.
>>>>> Here is our home page.
>>>>> The 2012 JIDX-CW result will be opened in a month or so.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://jidx.org/
>>>>> --
>>>>> JE1CKA Tack Kumgai
>>>>> je1cka@chofu.jaxa.jp
>>>>> je1cka@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On correction from a couple of guys, Mexico IS a multiplier. My error.
>>>>>
>>>>> But then, with 31 states and a "Federal District", we could have a lot
>>>>> more multipliers!
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Radio K0HB
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:26 AM
>>>>> To: CQ-Contest
>>>>> Subject: I just noticed....
>>>>> It's called the North America QSO Party.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hawaii is a multiplier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mexico isn't a multiplier.
>>>>>
>>>>> Odd, that!
>>>>>
>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>> --
>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>> --
>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>> --
>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but from NAQP's ridiculous precedent, the Distrito Federal would
>>>>> count as part of the State of Mexico despite the two being separate
>>>>> political entities, so you would add only 31 multipliers, not 32.
>>>>>
>>>>> 73,
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul, N8HM
>>>>> Washington, DC
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On correction from a couple of guys, Mexico IS a multiplier. My error.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But then, with 31 states and a "Federal District", we could have a lot
>>>>>> more multipliers!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Radio K0HB
>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 1:26 AM
>>>>>> To: CQ-Contest
>>>>>> Subject: I just noticed....
>>>>>> It's called the North America QSO Party.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hawaii is a multiplier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mexico isn't a multiplier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Odd, that!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Proud Member of:
>>>>>> A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
>>>>>> Minnesota Wireless contesters - http://www.W0AA.org
>>>>>> Arizona Outlaws contesters - http://www.arizonaoutlaws.net
>>>>>> Twin City DX Assn - http://www.tcdxa.org
>>>>>> Lake Vermilion DX Assn - http://www.lvdxa.org
>>>>>> CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
>>>>>> SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
>>>>>> Twin City FM Club - http://tcfmc.org
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Superstition trails --> http://oldslowhans.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
>>>>>> All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
>>>>>> LoTW participant
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|