CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer bashing
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:21:17 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Another silly and exaggerated extrapolation, Paul.

Besides, about half of those things you quote ARE good for ham radio!   ;)

Dave  AB7E



On 11/29/2012 6:41 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
On 30/11/2012 03:49, ko7ss@yahoo.com wrote:

Again, if it (Skimmer) attracts more contestants, and generates
> more QSO's, it must be good for ALL of us.

Absolutely!   And the following are good for ALL
of us - for the same reasons.

 High power.
 Extra-Class licences on demand.
 Integration with Facebook and Skype.
 More data modes.
 No-exam ham licences for CBers.
 Remote receivers and transmitters.

73,
Paul EI5DI







_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>