As I understand it, the procedure has changed a bit from last year. I'm
not sure that the FAQ is in step with the software.
The log-checking software is now supposed to accept more than one CLUB
line. One tidy approach is to put each club and its fraction on a separate
CLUB line. I haven't tried that, to see whether the robot will accept it.
Jeff didn't show the CLUB lines in the PJ2T log that bounced, so I don't
know whether he tried that.
The first example in the FAQ has a problem: WILLAMETTE VALLEY is not on the
list (it's a partial match with two clubs on the list).
73, Dave K1HT
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 7:19 PM, <BobK8IA@aol.com> wrote:
> I deal with this often, for the Arizona Outlaw Contest Club Contest
> Expedition credits. Here is what the CQWW FAQ says;
>
>
> "Single operator entries must indicate only ONE club that will receive
> their score.
> Multi-operator entries may split their score among the clubs of the
> operators. The split will be by a percentage of the number of club members
> participating in the operation. The split is defined on the CLUB: line of
> the log
> file. Here are some examples of club splits:
> CLUB: 3/8 WILLAMETTE VALLEY, 1/8 WESTERN WASHINGTON DX CLUB, 4/8 SOUTHERN
> CALIFORNIA CONTEST CLUB
> CLUB: 1/7 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CONTEST CLUB, 6/7 FRANKFORD RADIO CLUB
> Please spell out all club names according to the list of names at
> _http://www.cqww.com/clubnames.htm_ (http://www.cqww.com/clubnames.htm) ."
> 73, Bob K8IA
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|